← Portfolio
JioMart Partner · B2B Commerce · Reliance Jio

Driving a 95% Increase in Daily Orders by Streamlining Merchant Ordering

Reliance Jio

How we found where kirana merchants were dropping off, brought savings and margins forward to the moment they decide, and tested it with merchants before build.

JioMart Partner redesign: product list with tiered pricing, cart and checkout savings
95%Increase in average daily ordersQ4 FY22 → Q3 FY23
1,09,797Average daily orders by Q3 FY23Up from 56,267
13/13merchants understood the ladder-pricing modelUsability testing, before build

My role

Owned UX analysis, merchant and competitive research, information architecture, interaction design, prototyping and final UI, partnering with a UX researcher to turn merchant insights into the redesign.

SearchProduct listingCartCheckoutField researchUsability testing

Worked with

Akanksha Singh, UX Researcher
Product team
Development team

Timeline

8 weeks
Field research in Mumbai and Vadodara
KPIs tracked Q4 FY22 → Q3 FY23

01Problem

Merchants were dropping off at every step, and the reason to buy was hidden until checkout

JioMart Partner is a B2B app where kiranas, HoReCa, offices and institutions order in bulk, with thousands of orders a day. The data showed drop-offs growing as merchants moved through the journey: 16–29% after browsing, 10–19% at the cart and 23–43% at payment. And the thing a merchant buys for, savings and margin, stayed buried until checkout, where too much competed with the payment.

01 · Search

Hard to find things fast

No recent or popular searches, and no offers while searching.

02 · Product listing

Margin was invisible

Cluttered cards, and no clear bulk price or profit.

03 · Cart

Hard to edit, unclear savings

Quantities didn't look editable, and discounts showed up too late.

04 · Checkout

Too much at the money moment

The same amount shown twice, and a new page for every detail.

What we set out to do

Fix the ordering journey, and orders should follow

Project goal

Find what hurts the ordering journey most, and fix it for a seamless flow.

Measured byDrop-offs at each step
Business goal

Improve ROI by increasing the number of orders.

Measured byAverage daily orders
Research goal

Understand merchants’ needs, pain points and usability issues.

Measured byField interviews and reviews
How might we

improve the ordering journey by finding and fixing the usability issues and pain points merchants face?

02Approach

We started with the merchant and the data, then designed and tested before build

1 · Understand the merchant

Who orders, and what they care about

KS
Kishore Sinha38 · Kirana shop owner · Vadodara, Gujarat

Runs his shop on his own and buys through the day, with evenings the busiest. He reads basic English but prefers his own language, and in a crowded market his reputation depends on keeping customers happy.

Hard workingIndependentMultitasker

What decides a purchase

AffordabilityHigh
Product availabilityHigh
DeliveryModerate

We broke the journey into four touchpoints: home and search, product listing, cart and checkout. Each got the same treatment: drop-off data, a heuristic review and a competitor review.

StartMerchant opens the app
1Home page
BrowseSearchScanBannerNotifications
2PLP / PDPPick products
3CartReview the order
4CheckoutPay
✓Order placed
4 touchpoints

Each one got the same in-depth treatment: drop-off dataheuristic reviewcompetitor review

JioMart Partner home screen

Home

JioMart Partner product listing

Product listing

JioMart Partner cart

Cart

JioMart Partner checkout

Checkout

The journey before the redesign

2 · Read the data

Daily orders were the number to move

We started with the KPIs for Q4 FY22. The one we focused on was 56,267 average daily orders, and the question was how to grow it.

1,58,666Avg. daily visits
56,267Avg. daily orders
35%Orders per daily visit
Mode of discovery graphs
Where orders start. Browse and Search were the two biggest entry points, weekly and quarterly.
JioMart Kirana KPIs telemetry
Where merchants leave. Weekly drop-offs: 16–29% after browsing, 10–19% at cart, 23–43% at payment.

Drop-offs grew the closer merchants got to paying. Our working guesses for why:

1

Technical issues. Screens not responding.

2

No credit. Merchants who buy on credit leave when it isn't available.

3

Price and margin. A better price on another app.

4

Unclear checkout. Not understanding what they're paying for.

5

Rigid cart. Not able to understand or change what's in it.

3 · Heuristic & competitor review

We checked each screen against Nielsen's 10 usability principles

Visibility of system statusMatch with the real worldUser control and freedomConsistency and standardsError preventionRecognition over recallFlexibility and efficiencyAesthetic and minimalist designHelp with errorsHelp and documentation

Three screens, each checked against the principles. Pick a screen, then hover a highlight to see what we found.

123
123Search Autocomplete & History
  1. 1Recent searches are not shown.
  2. 2No suggestions or offers.
  3. 3Category based search results are not reflected. Could be shown better.
Principles violated
Aesthetic and minimalist designFlexibility and efficiency of useRecognition rather than recall

Hover a highlight or a note to link them

1121123
1Cart Value & Summary Header
  1. 1The total to pay isn’t highlighted.
12Quantity Modifier & Order Modification
  1. 1Quantity is editable but doesn’t look it.
  2. 2No easy way to remove an item, like a swipe or a “Remove” button.
1Schemes & Discount Copy
  1. 1Scheme and discount copy is unappealing.
123Bottom Bar, Journey Flow & Savings
  1. 1Items, quantity, price and savings aren’t clear.
  2. 2“Add more items” breaks the journey; it can go.
  3. 3Scheme and coupon savings only show after checkout. Showing them here would pull merchants forward.
Principles violated
Aesthetic and minimalist designFlexibility and efficiency of useRecognition rather than recallVisibility of system status

Hover a highlight or a note to link them

11234
1Pre-coupon Gross Total
  1. 1Misleading: shows the total before coupons and schemes.
1234Breakdown, Payment Preferences & Delivery
  1. 1The same amount is shown twice.
  2. 2Every detail opens a new page.
  3. 3Delivery details are missing.
  4. 4Visual representation needs to be improved.
Principles violated
Aesthetic and minimalist designFlexibility and efficiency of useRecognition rather than recallConsistency and standards

Hover a highlight or a note to link them

Then we studied who merchants compare us with

A B2B benchmark and an e-grocery benchmark that serve similar users. Same structure: pick a screen, hover to see the notes, and what we took from it.

B2B BenchmarkZomato Hyperpure5 screens
12
12Recent Searches & Offers
  1. 1Showing recent searches clearly.
  2. 2Showing all offers also.
What we took

Recent searches and offers, right in Search.

Hover a highlight or a note to link them

1
1Autocomplete & Categorisation
  1. 1Segregating search results into categories and products as well.
What we took

Results split by category and product.

Hover a highlight or a note to link them

1234
1234Product Listing & Variations
  1. 1For the same product there are different variations.
  2. 2As soon as the merchant adds the product to the cart, in the PLP itself the price to be paid for that product is shown.
  3. 3Upfront widget for helping user find their desired product.
  4. 4Visual representation is clean and minimal.
What we took

The price to pay, shown on the product list; variants side by side.

Hover a highlight or a note to link them

12345
12345Breakdown & Recommendations
  1. 1Clearly reflecting the amount to be paid in the cart itself.
  2. 2Showing bestseller recommendations as well.
  3. 3Easy to modify empty cart CTA and delete button.
  4. 4Clean and minimal visual representation.
  5. 5Decluttering the screen by using dropdown for representing amount breakup.
What we took

The amount to pay up front, bestsellers, and a dropdown for the breakup.

Hover a highlight or a note to link them

1234
1234Payment Details & Savings
  1. 1Focusing only on the amount to be paid with no distractions.
  2. 2Easy to switch payment options.
  3. 3Highlighting other/new features available in a subtle visual manner without confusing the user.
  4. 4Highlighting savings.
What we took

A checkout about paying, with savings highlighted.

Hover a highlight or a note to link them

E-Grocery BenchmarkBigBasket4 screens
1234
1234Review Basket & Categories
  1. 1Segregating the categories & items in cart.
  2. 2Signifying the discount grabbed at each product.
  3. 3Instead of just basket, BigBasket calls it "Review Basket" to specify the fact of reviewing the order.
  4. 4Clearly representing the price to be paid and the discount availed.
What we took

Savings shown on every item, and a “review” moment before paying.

Hover a highlight or a note to link them

1234
1234Saved for Later & Checkout CTA
  1. 1Towards the end of the cart there is saved for later items section which can be accessed to easily add them to the cart.
  2. 2Using colours in the textual information (green for amount saved, Red for Checkout) to highlight the information.
  3. 3Clear & Highlighted Checkout CTA is given importance to attract user’s attention.
  4. 4When there is an item saved for later then it can be easily added to the cart.
What we took

Colour for savings and a checkout button you can’t miss.

Hover a highlight or a note to link them

123
123Recent & Popular Searches
  1. 1Recent searches are clearly highlighted.
  2. 2Popular searches are clearly highlighted.
  3. 3Offers and trending products are promoted.
What we took

Recent and popular searches, plus offers.

Hover a highlight or a note to link them

1234
1234Payable, Savings & Offers
  1. 1Highlighting Total Savings and Total Payable amount only to avoid confusion.
  2. 2Providing options to pay rather than showing any other option that can confuse the user.
  3. 3Highlighting vouchers available.
  4. 4Highlighting payment options with offers.
What we took

Only the total to pay and the total saved.

Hover a highlight or a note to link them

4 · Talk to merchants

We went to their shops in Mumbai and Vadodara

With my UX researcher, we ran moderated interviews with 20 merchants in a tier 1 and a tier 2 city, to hear their needs, pain points and ideas first-hand.

Field research with merchants
Field research in Mumbai (tier 1) and Vadodara (tier 2)
Who we recruited
  • Active merchants in urban and semi-urban areas
  • At least 2 orders in the last month
  • A mix of those who order themselves and those who need a sales officer’s help
  • Aged 26 to 50
Participant screener
Age26–3031–3536–4041–4546–50
Merchants44444

20 merchants · Mumbai and Vadodara

5 · Insights to ideas

Every finding got a type and an owner, not just a design fix

Some problems were ours to design. Others needed tech or business. Tagging each one kept the redesign focused on what design could actually move.

Usability issueRecommendationBusiness issueTechnical bug
Technical bugTech Team

The page is slow to load.

FixTech team to improve load time and stability.

Usability issueTech Team, UI/UX team

Search needs to be more robust and easier to use.

FixShow recent searches, suggestions and offers while searching; improve the algorithm and drop irrelevant results.

Business issueBusiness Team

Limited product variety causes drop-offs after browsing.

FixBusiness team to add wanted products and improve availability.

Usability issueUI/UX team

Not showing the net amount to pay causes drop-offs after browsing.

FixShow the net amount to pay on the PLP as soon as a product is added, including auto-applied coupons and schemes.

Business issueBusiness Team, UI/UX team

Competitors offer better prices.

FixBusiness team to sharpen prices and offers; design to show them better.

Usability issueUI/UX team

The PLP feels cluttered.

FixDeclutter the PLP.

Usability issueUI/UX team

Discounts and margins aren’t clear.

FixLadder pricing to show quantity tiers and the discount at each.

Business issueBusiness Team, UI/UX team

Competitors offer better prices.

FixBusiness team to sharpen prices and offers; design to show them better.

RecommendationUI/UX team

Useful recommendations can grow the order

FixSuggest bestsellers in the cart that are easy to add and grow the order.

RecommendationUI/UX team

Highlighted savings nudge merchants towards checkout.

FixHighlight the amount saved, which is the merchant’s margin; business to improve margins.

RecommendationTech team, UI/UX team

Key details in the cart aren’t prioritised.

FixPrioritise savings, delivery date and shipment details visually.

Usability issueUI/UX team

Relevant coupons aren’t suggested.

FixHighlight applicable coupons and make them easy to apply.

Usability issueUI/UX team

Cart items are hard to change.

FixClear edit buttons and an obviously editable quantity.

RecommendationUI/UX team

Only what’s needed, no distractions, while paying.

FixOnly payment information at checkout; everything else is settled earlier.

RecommendationUI/UX team

Highlighted savings nudge merchants to pay.

FixHighlight the amount saved, which is the merchant’s margin.

RecommendationBusiness team, UI/UX team

Payment options aren’t clear.

FixShow only the total, payment options and payment-related items like wallet balance and savings, so nothing distracts.

Usability issueUI/UX team

Cluttered UI and misleading paths.

FixA clear, focused payment UI.

Then we sketched, starting from how merchants already work

Ideation sketches and merchant ledger
Merchants’ handwritten ledgers, and the wireframe sketches they led to
Ledger → ladder pricing

Merchants work out bulk orders in notebooks. A ladder pricing table shows quantity tiers, unit price and margin the same way.

A calmer checkout

Price breakups collapse into a dropdown, so the payment is the only thing competing for attention.

Savings in the cart

Net savings and margin in the sticky cart footer, with quantities easy to change inline.

6 · Prioritise

An impact × effort matrix decided what went first

Each idea was scored on impact (for the merchant, the business and the product) and effort (design, tech and business time), so we could ship the quick wins first.

Impact versus effort matrix
Quick wins first, then major projects. Fill-ins when there’s time, thankless tasks never.
Example of prioritising a solution
Example: a sticky widget showing the margin earned. High impact, low to moderate effort, so a quick win.
Quick winsHigh impact, low effort · do first
Major projectsHigh impact, high effort · plan
Fill-insLow impact, low effort · when there’s time
Thankless tasksLow impact, high effort · skip

Priority weighed three things: criticality (benefit to merchant, business and product), how it’s built (design, tech, business or a mix), and time to ship.

03Solution
2 · Product listing

Show the margin where the decision happens

The idea from the ledger notebooks: a ladder pricing table with quantity, price per unit and profit percent, right on the card. Variants are easy to pick, the card is decluttered, and the call to action is clear.

BeforeCluttered, schemes in dropdowns
Older product listing screen
→
AfterLadder pricing with profit %
Proposed product listing with ladder pricing
  • Easy to select desired variant.
  • Mentioning profit percentage clearly and using the concept of ladder pricing to help in decision making.
  • Clear CTA.
  • Decluttered product card.

Try it: how the ladder picks your price

Change the quantity and watch the tier, unit price and profit update.

Tata Sampann Unpolished Tur / Arhar Dal, 1 kgMRP ₹180 · minimum order 10
QuantityPrice / unitProfit
10₹158.4012%
11 – 100₹154.8014%
101 – 300₹151.2016%
Your tier10 units
Price per unit₹158.40
Order value₹1,584
Profit if sold at MRP₹216 12%
You save vs MRP₹216
Add 1 more to drop to ₹154.80 a unit and earn 14%.

This is the point of the dense table: merchants buy on margin. Showing the next tier, and exactly how far away it is, turns the table into a decision, not just more information on the card.

3 · Cart

Make the savings impossible to miss

The cart now shows only relevant discounts, the total items, easy delete and clear − and + controls, and puts the amount and what you save in the footer, next to Proceed.

BeforeTotal and savings unclear
Older cart screen
→
AfterAmount and savings by Proceed
Proposed cart screen
  • Representing only relatable discounts.
  • Representing total number of items clearly.
  • Deleting an element easily from cart.
  • Clear "-" & "+" buttons and clearly editable quantity of the product.
  • Signifying the auto applied coupons/savings availed clearly.
  • Representing Cart Amount clearly.
4 · Checkout

Only the amount, the savings and how to pay

Checkout focuses on the amount to pay, what you save and the payment options. The full breakup is still there, one tap away in a dropdown, instead of on separate pages.

BeforeSame amount twice, extra pages
Older checkout screen
After · collapsedAmount and savings first
Proposed checkout collapsed
After · expandedBreakup when you want it
Proposed checkout expanded
  • Decluttering the checkout page and only highlighting the amount to be paid and the savings to limit any distraction.
  • There is a dropdown in case the user wants to see the calculation, but the focus is on the amount to be paid, savings (to add a delightful element) and the payment options to complete the payment.
  • Dropdown can be accessed when required to see the break-up details.
04Validation

We tested three ladder-pricing designs with merchants before build

Before development, we ran multivariate tests, unmoderated on Maze plus in-person sessions to see which product listing design merchants found easiest.

Plan

Scope, method and script, with Maze as the testing tool.

Run

Clear tasks, self-reported UX metrics and recruited merchants.

Analyse

A test report, observation, interviews and merchant insights.

Tasks on each prototype
  • Find offers on the product listing
  • Find bulk offers when ladder pricing wasn’t shown upfront
  • Pick the ladder pricing design that’s easiest to understand
Participant screener
Age26–3031–3536–4041–4546–50
Merchants22222

Screener above: 10 merchants by age · 13 merchants in total completed the Maze test · Mumbai and Vadodara

Three prototype options
Option 1, 2 and 3: different ladder pricing, coupon and bulk offer placements
38%

Mis-click rate when offers were hidden, avg. 23 seconds to find them

11/13

merchants (85%) picked Option 3: price, quantity, profit and offers all upfront, no extra taps

13/13

merchants understood the ladder-pricing model: price, quantity and profit

Heatmap and clickstream
Heatmap for "check for offers on Tata Sampann Arhar Dal"
Preference survey
"Select the option that is easiest to understand"
Ladder pricing comprehension
"Can you understand the pricing, quantity and profit?"
Merchants compare prices with Udaan, BigBasket and their distributor lists, then order wherever they make the most profit. Ladder pricing put that comparison on our product card.
Maze testing platform
Testing ran on Maze
05Outcome

Daily orders nearly doubled in three quarters

We met the design deadline, so the redesign shipped on time. We tracked the same KPIs from before the work began.

VOLUME
+95%

Average daily orders, 56,267 → 1,09,797

Part of this came from more daily visits and a growing merchant base over the same quarters, so it isn't all down to the redesign.
CONVERSION · ADJUSTED FOR TRAFFIC
35% → 46%

Orders per daily visit

Out of every 100 daily visits, 46 now end in an order instead of 35. Because it's measured per visit, more traffic can't inflate it. It's the clearest evidence that the redesigned journey converts better.

Average daily orders

Per quarter, FY 2021–22 to FY 2022–23

56,267
69,442
82,107
1,09,797
Q4 FY22Q1 FY23Q2 FY23Q3 FY23
Data pointsQ4 21–22Q1 22–23Q2 22–23Q3 22–23
Avg. daily visits1,58,6662,04,1502,41,9992,38,920
Avg. daily orders56,26769,44282,1071,09,797
Orders per daily visit35%34%34%46%
The number I trust mostIn the last quarter, daily visits dipped slightly while daily orders jumped 34%. More of the merchants who came in went on to order.
What I don't lean onThe merchant base also grew a lot over these quarters, so the redesign isn’t the only reason orders went up.
Up next
OneCard Travel screens
OneCard·FinTech / Travel

Helping Drive 2.2× Flight Booking Conversion by Building a Scalable Travel Ecosystem

Led end-to-end design for native flight booking on a partner engine, with reward points as the reason to book with us.

2.2× booking conversionRead case study →